Notes from the Smartest Room in Finance

What I Heard at the 2026 Strategic Investment Conference — and What I Think It Means for You (Part I)

I just spent several days at the Strategic Investment Conference, an annual gathering of some of the most respected — and most opinionated — voices in finance. Six speakers stood out: David Rosenberg, Louis Gave, Lacy Hunt, Dave Bahnsen, John Mauldin, and Ben Hunt. They don't always agree with each other (and frankly, I don't always agree with them). But this year, an unusual amount of consensus emerged around a handful of big themes.

None of what I'm about to share is a recommendation to do anything in your portfolio today. Think of it as the kind of long-haul thinking that quietly shapes the decisions we make together over time. Here's what I want you to know.

1. The classic "60/40" portfolio is showing its age

For decades, the standard advice was simple: 60% stocks, 40% bonds, sit back, and let time do the work. It was a wonderful era for that recipe. The last five years have been less kind.

Louis Gave (a globally minded investor with a strong long-term track record) pointed out that a U.S. balanced portfolio has gained roughly 8% in total — not annualized — over the last five years. After inflation, that's a real loss. The reason is that bonds, which used to cushion stocks during bad times, were themselves crushed by rising rates in 2022 and have not fully recovered.

His proposed update for an inflationary world is heavier on "real things" — energy and gold — alongside stocks. I'm not endorsing his exact mix, and your portfolio depends on your situation. But the larger point is one I take seriously: in a world where inflation may run hotter than the 2010s trained us to expect, owning real assets alongside paper assets matters more than it used to.

2. Your "diversified" index fund is more concentrated than you think

David Rosenberg shared a number that's hard to unhear: the top 10 technology companies now make up about 40% of the S&P 500. That's roughly double the concentration at the peak of the late-1990s dot-com bubble.

This doesn't mean a crash is around the corner. It does mean that if you own a "total market" or S&P 500 index fund, a remarkably large share of your fortunes rides on seven or eight companies — Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Tesla, and so on. When they sneeze, the index catches a cold.

The takeaway isn't "sell everything tech." It's: know what you actually own. Equal-weighted exposure, international diversification, and value-tilted strategies all do something different from the headline index. They've been quietly out of favor for years, which is often when these things become interesting.

Three Developments in China Worth Watching

In 2018, China was a minor auto exporter. In 2025, projections put its car exports at around 9 million vehicles — more than Japan, Germany, or the U.S. A LiDAR sensor (the laser "eyes" that help cars see) cost $50,000 five years ago. A Chinese company has driven the cost down to about $300 — a 99.5% reduction. And China now produces more electricity than the U.S. and Europe combined, installing more industrial robots each year than currently exist in the United States.

3. China didn't just catch up — it changed the game

Louis Gave argued — persuasively, I thought — that the most important economic event of the last decade isn't the pandemic, the inflation spike, or AI. It's that China quietly transformed itself from a maker of cheap goods into a world-class industrial competitor across nearly every sector.

The trigger? The 2018 U.S. restriction on selling high-end semiconductors to China. Rather than back down, China redirected its enormous savings pool away from real estate and into industrial self-sufficiency. Seven years later, the results are visible in everything from electric vehicles to LiDAR sensors to high-speed rail (China built Indonesia's first; California still doesn't have one).

You don't have to invest in China to care about this. It reshapes the competitive landscape for every American company you do own. And it's a reminder of one of the oldest truths in investing: the things that quietly change over a decade often matter more than the things that scream in the headlines.

4. The debt math is starting to matter

John Mauldin walked through the federal debt picture, and the arithmetic is sobering. U.S. federal debt is now around 125% of GDP. The deficit this year will probably land near $2 trillion when you include items the official figures gloss over.

Mauldin's point wasn't doom and gloom — he's actually long-term optimistic, and he expects we'll get through this. His point was about the math: even if Congress raised taxes on the top 10% of earners by 20%, it would generate only about $300 billion — covering perhaps 15% of the gap. The arithmetic doesn't close without bigger structural changes, and those changes typically only happen after a crisis forces the conversation.

Lacy Hunt — a fixed-income economist who has spent more than four decades correctly predicting that long-term interest rates would keep falling — actually reversed his position this year. He now believes the trend in long-term Treasury yields will be upward. That's not a small revision. It's the kind of call that, if right, has implications for almost every asset class.

5. Energy is quietly becoming the world's most important asset

If there was one thread woven through almost every speaker's presentation, it was energy. Powering AI data centers takes enormous amounts of it. Manufacturing needs it. Geopolitics increasingly turns on who has it. And inflation, ultimately, routes back through it.

Ben Hunt, who tracks how the global media talks about markets, made an observation I keep chewing on: for most of the postwar era, the U.S. dollar's strength was backed by military power (specifically the Navy's protection of shipping lanes). Today, he argues, it's increasingly backed by American energy dominance. The U.S. is now one of the largest oil and gas exporters in the world, and in a world where energy is the fulcrum, that matters more than aircraft carriers.

Energy stocks are about 3.5% of the S&P 500 today. Hunt and Gave both think that share grows from here.

What this means for you (and what it doesn't)

Before I get to the practical takeaways, let me say what I'm not saying. I'm not telling you to panic. None of the speakers were calling for an imminent crash. Most expected markets to keep going for some time, even as the longer-term picture gets more complicated. I'm not telling you to overhaul your portfolio tomorrow morning. And I'm certainly not telling you that any of these very smart people have a crystal ball — they don't, and neither do I.

Here's what I actually want you to take away:

  • Diversification still works — but the definition is widening. "Diversified" used to mean stocks plus bonds. In the world the SIC speakers are describing, it may now mean stocks plus bonds plus real assets — some energy, some real estate, perhaps some gold, and probably some genuine international exposure beyond U.S. multinationals.

  • Know what you actually own. If your "diversified" portfolio is mostly an S&P 500 index fund and a U.S. bond fund, you may have far more concentrated tech exposure — and far less inflation protection — than you'd choose if you sat down and built it from scratch.

  • Boring is underrated. Mauldin's personal strategy for navigating uncertainty is unglamorous: own businesses that have raised their dividend every year for 30 or 40 years. Procter & Gamble. McDonald's. Companies that sell things people buy regardless of what the world is doing. There's a reason these end up in most thoughtful portfolios.

  • Have a plan before you need one. Most investors don't suffer from bad markets — they suffer from making bad decisions during bad markets. The plan you make in calm waters is the plan you lean on when things get choppy. That's a big part of the work you and I do together, and it's worth doing now, not later.

If any of this sparks a question about your own situation — your allocation, your tech concentration, how much real-asset exposure you have, whether your bond holdings are positioned for the world I just described — that's exactly the conversation I'm here for. Reach out anytime. I'd rather we talk one too many times than one too few. Call Aspire Planning Associates at (925) 938-2023 to schedule a conversation today.

Until next time,

Evor C. Vattuone, CFP®